Legal Opinion
D'Amico v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 19, 1981PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs to Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance Company.
The homeowner’s policy issued by Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance Company, by its express terms, would cover Dennis Traína as an insured only if he were a resident of his parents’ household. Since the only evidence submitted by the parties establishes that Dennis did not actually reside in his parents’ household at the relevant time, summary judgment was properly granted.
*1002Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. FredaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. KowalskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Kradjian v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Nationwide Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Walburn v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.