Legal Opinion

In re B.L.J.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1986No. S-648PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This case involves an interpretation of the children in need of aid statute, AS 47.10.080(c)(1). The Department of Health and Social Services (Department) contends that once a court declares a minor a child in need of aid and commits the minor to the Department under AS 47.10.080(c)(1), then the Department has the authority to direct the placement of the minor. The court can review the Department’s decision to see if it constitutes an abuse of discretion, but it cannot make a specific placement order once legal custody has been granted to the Department. We agree.

FACTUA…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hootch Ex Rel. Hootch v. Alaska State-Operated School SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. North Slope Borough v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Headlough v. HeadloughAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Forquer v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Hickey v. BellAlaska Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Braun v. Alaska Commercial Fishing & Agriculture BankAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. A.H. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. S.S.M. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. D.H. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In Re the Adoption of Missy M.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API