Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 25, 1957No. Appeal, No. 157PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Pee Cueiam,
We are in accord with the determination of this action in assumpsit and the judgment entered in favor of the defendant is affirmed on the following portion of the able opinion of Judge Lewis :
“This matter comes before the court en banc on the plaintiff’s motion for judgment on an agreed set of facts.
“The defendant company issued a life insurance policy in the face amount of $5,000 on the life of Francis R. Thomas, Jr., effective February 28, 1948.
“His father, Francis R. Thomas, Sr., plaintiff in this action, was named beneficiary.
“The policy contained an accidental death…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- The Brig Amy WarwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Western Reserve Life Insurance v. MeadowsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Ebbert v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Beley v. Pennsylvania Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. McCabeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Taylor v. KaufholdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Treasure Craft Jewelers, Inc. v. Jefferson InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Stucker v. College Life Insurance Co. of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Weiner v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.