Legal Opinion

Sherill v. Sherill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 17, 1924No. 8 Div. 582PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

On the undisputed evidence in this case we think and hold that complainants were (entitled to the relief prayed.

The estate granted by Mary J. Swinney and her children to the respondents S. O. and M. A. Sherill, though a vested estate, was expressly subjected to forfeiture in ease the grantees should “fail to carry out any part” of the obligation undertaken by them, viz. the support and care of Mrs. Swinney during the remainder of her life. The estate was therefore one upon condition subsequent.

Such an estate is not divested from the grantee merely by the grantee’s breach of the condition, but…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. NeighborsMississippi Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1881
  4. Warner v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. WeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Trustees of Howard College v. McNabbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Craig v. CraigSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Mayor of Rockville v. WalkerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Wood v. CantrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API