Legal Opinion
Bailey v. City of National City
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 16, 1991No. D011272PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FROEHLICH, J.
Alan Bailey appeals from a judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. Bailey, a police officer with respondent City of National City, was terminated based on his alleged violations of the city’s police department rules and regulations. 2 Bailey petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandamus, contending the action of the city council in upholding his termination was an abuse of discretion and was unsupported by the evidence. Bailey also contended that rule 3.3, one of the rules he was found to have violated, could not be relied upon because it was…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kazensky v. City of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- City of Costa Mesa v. SofferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Fremont Union High School District v. Santa Clara County Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Bautista v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Arellanes v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.