Legal Opinion

Kraft Corrugated Containers, Inc. v. Trumbull Asphalt Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 6, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FORMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement on November 31, 1936, whereby defendant agreed to furnish plaintiff’s building with live steam for manufacturing and heating purposes. It was agreed that plaintiff, defendant and a third party should “share equally between them each to the extent of one third, the operating expenses of the boilers and the boiler plant, to the end that they each receive their respective requirements of steam at actual cost and the lowest minimum price obtainable under the circumstances”. A further provision of the contract with reference…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Smoot's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Mobley v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Kimel v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kraft Corrugated Containers, Inc. v. Trumbull Asphalt Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API