Legal Opinion
United States v. Quintero
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 22, 1999No. 97-5487PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUBINA, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant Frank Quintero’s (“Quintero”) motion to dismiss Counts 18(b), 18(c), and 19 of a third superseding indictment on the basis of collateral estoppel. The government cross-appeals the district court’s order granting in part Quintero’s motion to dismiss Counts 18(a), 25, 27, 30, 31, 33, and 34 of the third superseding indictment on the basis of collateral estoppel. Because the collateral estoppel doctrine implicates the constitutional protection against double jeopardy, we have jurisdiction to review this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. ShenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. TokarsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Darrell G. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mary Quinn v. Monroe County, James L. Roberts, County Administrator, Monroe County, individually and in his official capacityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Binyamin OhayonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) Societe Anon. v. KhalilDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- United States v. Valdiviez-GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. McCoyDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.