Legal Opinion

Carrillo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 10, 2003No. 3D03-1287PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to correct the final judgment as to the degree of crime for which the defendant was convicted. See Copcutt v. State, 477 So.2d 70 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)(case remanded to correct degree of crime for which defendant was convicted). The final judgment classifies the burglary of an unoccupied dwelling as a second degree felony when it should be categorized as a third degree felony. See § 810.02(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). This change does not affect the defendant’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Copcutt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steward v. Dept. of Children and FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. C.Y. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. C.Y. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. C.Y. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API