Legal Opinion

Nill v. Martin

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1996No. 43A03-9506-CV-205PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-respondent Mark Steven Nill appeals and appellee-petitioner Karen (Nill) Martin cross-appeals the trial court’s order regarding modification of child support. Mark and Karen present a total of six issues for review, which we combine and restate as whether the trial court erred in: 1) finding that the original child support order had been modified by agreement and, as a result, in computing Mark’s child support arrearage; 2) ordering Mark to pay both child support *938and college expenses; 3) computing orthodontia expenses; and 4) awarding Karen attorney fees.

FACTS

Mark…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tuthill Corp., Fill-Rite Division v. WolfeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Kinsey v. KinseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Donegan v. DoneganIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In Re the Marriage of PulleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Kaplon v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nill v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Mark Steven Nill v. Karen (Nill) MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API