Commonwealth Ex Rel. Bagnoni v. Klemm
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUTCHINSON, Justice.
Resolution of this case turns solely upon a question of statutory construction: viz. whether an Act of Assembly which requires “a vote of two-thirds of the members” to override the Mayor’s veto means two-thirds of the entire body or two-thirds of the members present. We hold that in the context of section 413(a) the Optional Third Class City Charter Law (Article IV, Mayor-Council Plan A), Act of July *56815, 1957, P.L. 901, as amended, 53 P.S. § 41413(a), the quoted expression means two-thirds of the entire body. We therefore reverse the Commonwealth Court, 61 Pa.Cmwlth.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BarnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Meixell v. Hellertown Borough CouncilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fortney v. WozneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Munce v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Seda-Cog Joint Rail Authority v. Carload Express, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Borough v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Bagnoni v. KlemmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Hodge v. HodgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Hodge v. HodgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.