Legal Opinion

Muntaqim v. Lay

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 12, 2016No. CV-15-789PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2016 Ark. 206

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS. No. CV-15-789 Opinion Delivered May 12, 2016 MALIK MUNTAQIM APPELLANT PRO SE MOTION TO FILE BELATED NON-CONFORMING V. REPLY BRIEF [JEFFERSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. 35CV-15-184] GAYLON R. LAY ET AL. APPELLEES HONORABLE JODI RAINES DENNIS, JUDGE MOTION DENIED; CONFORMING REPLY BRIEF DUE SIXTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS OPINION. PER CURIAM Appellant Malik Muntaqim filed a pro se complaint in the Jefferson County Circuit Court alleging violation of his civil rights by a number of current and past state officers and employees who Muntaqim, an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State, Department of Career Education, Division of Rehabilitation Services v. MeansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eddie S. Watkins III v. Raymond Adams, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ethel Mae Nalls AdamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API