Legal Opinion

Lee v. Melson

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 10, 1964PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, P. J.

The question in this case is whether the trial court, having granted the original plaintiff a new trial on the ground of the inadequacy of the verdict, erred in refusing to grant the cross plaintiffs a new trial. For reasons to be stated we have concluded cross plaintiffs were properly denied a new trial.

Hayes C. Melson brought the original action against Mr. and Mrs. Charles A. Lee to recover damages growing out of an intersectional collision between the automobiles of the parties. The Lees then brought a cross action to recover damages growing out of the same collision.

After a full…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Perkins v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Sparrow v. BromageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  3. Street Railway v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. SesslerTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Securities Inv. Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fye v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. Nash-Wilson Funeral Home, Inc. v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
  3. Hogan v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  4. Cindy Hatfield v. Allenbrooke Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
  5. Diane R. Cannon Kellon and William T. Kellon v. Marsha Lee, M.D. and Semmes-Murphey ClinicCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API