Legal Opinion
Poole v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 17, 2001No. 5D00-3604PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
791 So.2d 1232 (2001)
Nathaniel POOLE, Jr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D00-3604.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
August 17, 2001.
Nathaniel Poole, Jr., Jasper, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PLEUS, J.
Appellant, Nathaniel Poole, Jr., timely appeals the trial court's order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis which the trial court correctly treated as a Rule 3.850 motion. See Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999). Poole argues that the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Isley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Rahymes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Vonia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Keith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Poole v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Quarrels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001