Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Hornsby

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 2, 1938No. 2 Div. 119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The original bill was filed by the heir at law of the mortgagor, to redeem from a mortgage foreclosure sale a part of the property covered by the mortgage and the foreclosure, and as amended, the bill averred that the complainant, before the filing of the original bill, had exercised the statutory right to redeem the other property covered by the mortgage and the foreclosure thereof.

The circuit court sustained the demurrer of the defendants to the bill on the ground, among others, that the statutory right of redemption could not be exercised by piece meal, and when exercised in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilks v. WilksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Goodwin v. DonohueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Duncan v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Otts v. AverySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Wragg v. Federal Land BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API