Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Thomas Johnson, Richard Lee Niedfeldt, and David Lynn Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 22, 1993No. 92-3442, 92-3459 and 92-3460PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Robert Thomas Johnson, Richard Lee Niedfeldt, and David Lynn Johnson appeal from their convictions in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, Richard D. Rogers, J., stemming from a transaction involving phenyl-2-propanone (P2P, also known as phenylacetone), a Schedule II controlled substance used in the production of amphetamine and methamphetamine. For reasons given below, we affirm the convictions of all three appellants except, with respect to Robert Johnson, for the issues raised by his motion for a new trial; we also vacate the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Julian W. Sears v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Carol BirneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Nicholas UccioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Rimbert v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Alphonso Pedraza, United States of America v. Peter Brent Irelan, United States of America v. Enrique PedrazaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. HeckardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Angel Torres, A/K/A Victor SanchezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.