Legal Opinion

Carothers v. GEICO Indemnity Co.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided August 17, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jack M. Battaglia, J.

Perhaps the most noteworthy aspect of this decision and order is that, by stipulation of the parties, it resolves an important *550threshold question for purposes of several hundred actions pending between them in this and other courts. In each of the actions, plaintiff health care provider, Andrew Carothers, M.D., P.C., seeks to recover payment from defendant GEICO Indemnity Company of first-party no-fault benefits that have been assigned to plaintiff and that plaintiff has allegedly assigned to two third parties, Medtrx Capital, LLC and Medtrx Provider…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Sheridan v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Clifton-Fine Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Cummings v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API