Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Barnes & Tucker Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1977No. Civ. A. 76-577PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN L. MILLER, District Judge.

In September of 1973 Boyd A. Shaffer filed a claim for Black Lung benefits pursuant to Title IV of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, as amended, 30 U.S.C. § 901 et seq. (Supp. V, 1975) (Coal Act). Because Barnes and Tucker Company (Company) controverted its liability for paying said benefits an administrative hearing was held on January 9, 1975 at which time the parties to this action were present with counsel along with Shaffer and his counsel. We need not go into the facts adduced at that hearing. Suffice it to say that the Hearing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Kenneth E. Thompson v. Potashnick Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Davis v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. Kinder v. Coleman & Yates Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1997
  5. Davis v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API