Legal Opinion
Moore v. Rohm & Haas Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 1, 2007No. 5:03 CV 1342PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DOWD, District Judge.
Before the Court is the question, raised sua sponte, as to whether the Complaint, as amended (Doc. No. 113), is really several separate lawsuits rolled into one. The legal issue is whether under, 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and/or Fed.R.Civ.P. 20, parts of this lawsuit should be either dismissed without prejudice or transferred to other federal district courts.
At the Court’s direction, the parties have filed briefs (which have been supplemented, with leave). These include: Plaintiffs’ Brief (Doc. No. 124, supplemented by Doc. No. 127); and Defendants’…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Angela M. Phelps v. John D. McClellanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Kenneth P. Bidlack v. Wheelabrator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- American Federation of Grain Millers v. International Multifoods Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Key v. Tire Discounters, IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Litton v. Tire Discounters, IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Moffett v. Tire Discounters, IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Patrick v. Tire Discounters, IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Patrick v. Tire Discounters, IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.