Argumedo Alvarez-Madrigal v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Kirsch, Judge.
Following a jury trial, Argumedo Alvarez-Madrigal (“Alvarez-Madrigal”) was convicted of four counts of Class A felony child molesting1 and two counts of Class C felony child molesting.2 He appeals, contending that a statement by a State’s witness constituted impermissible vouching evidence and that it was reversible error to admit it.
We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
When she was ten years old and in the fourth grade, A.M. met and became close friends with fellow fourth-grader S.A.O., whose father is Alvarez-Madrigal. During the summer before the girls entered fifth grade,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoglund v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Otte v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Brandon Robey v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Bradford v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ryan E. Bean v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Travis Bogard v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. Wilson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- State v. Jobert L. MoldeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
- State v. Jobert L. MoldeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
- James I.M. Lines v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.