Neu v. Lessner
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
When Wilmer Breeden died, his will designated the bulk of his estate to be placed in trust and used to promote the principles of socialism and related causes. Claiming Breeden’s bequest was not intended to be a charitable trust and was not otherwise valid because it failed to designate definite beneficiaries and violated the rule against perpetuities, Breeden’s nephew (Peter Neu) and niece (Nancy Deets) unsuccessfully petitioned to have the trust provision declared invalid and the estate residue given to them as intestate heirs. On their appeal from an order denying the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Harrington v. PierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- City of Philadelphia v. Heirs of GirardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
- Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of BreedenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989