Legal Opinion

Neu v. Lessner

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1989No. D006663PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

When Wilmer Breeden died, his will designated the bulk of his estate to be placed in trust and used to promote the principles of socialism and related causes. Claiming Breeden’s bequest was not intended to be a charitable trust and was not otherwise valid because it failed to designate definite beneficiaries and violated the rule against perpetuities, Breeden’s nephew (Peter Neu) and niece (Nancy Deets) unsuccessfully petitioned to have the trust provision declared invalid and the estate residue given to them as intestate heirs. On their appeal from an order denying the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Harrington v. PierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. City of Philadelphia v. Heirs of GirardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
  5. Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of BreedenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API