Brinkley v. Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
The issue here to be resolved is whether under the doctrine of respondeat superior a client is liable for the tortious conduct of his attorney which causes injury to a third party. The trial court held that there was no such liability, and this appeal follows.
William and Helen Brinkley, the plaintiffs in the present proceeding, sustained severe injuries when the vehicle in which they were riding collided with a vehicle owned and operated by Clarence N. Holeman. For the purposes of this proceeding, at least, it is conceded that the collision was solely the result of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- RICH. ASS'N OF MEN v. Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Jacobson v. ParrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Hurla ex rel. Hurla v. Capper Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Buehman v. SmelkerArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- United States v. Thelma Louise HainlineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- William L. Brinkley v. Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation, Helen L. Brinkley v. Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973