Legal Opinion

Eichhorn-Burkhard v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. REMINDER TO COUNSEL -- This case is a tag-a-long action to 19-md-2887, MDL 2887 In Re: Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc., Dog Food Products Liability Litigation

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 2, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02672Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS IN RE: HILL’S PET NUTRITION, INC., DOG FOOD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2887 Case No. 19-md-2887-JAR-TJJ (This Document Relates to all MDL cases and Eichhorn-Burkhard v. Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc. and Colgate-Palmolive Company, D. Kan. Case No. 19-cv-2672-JAR-TJJ) and DIANA ANJA EICHHORN-BURKHARD, Plaintiff, Case No. 19-CV-2672-JAR-TJJ v. HILL’S PET NUTRITION, INC. and COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SEPARATE LITIGATION TRACK AND CONSOLIDATING AND COORDINATING…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re EpiPen Marketing, Sales Practices & Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API