Disco 95, Inc. v. Calderone
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINTON, Judge.
The employee/carrier, having voluntarily dismissed their appeal, leave before us claimant’s cross-appeal challenging the constitutionality of Section 440.15(3). This statutory provision has been considered by the court in Carr v. Central Florida Aluminum Products, Inc., 402 So.2d 565 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), Acton v. Ft. Lauderdale Hospital, 418 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), Mahoney v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 419 So.2d 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) and Alfred John v. GDG Seryices, Inc., 424 So.2d 114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) and in each case has withstood the attack. Accordingly, the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Acton v. Ft. Lauderdale Hosp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Carr v. Central Florida Aluminum Products, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Mahoney v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- John v. GDG Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
3Cited by1 opinion
- Houghton v. ABJ Constructors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983