Legal Opinion

Talcott v. Beauty Spring Water Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the plaintiff, Frank H. Talcott, as president, etc., from, an order of the County Court of Lewis county, entered in the office of the clerk of said county on the 5th day of February, 1909, vacating an order granted on the 28th day of .August, 1908, for the examination of the officers of the Beauty Spring Water Company.

1Opinion of the Court

Kruse, J.:

The respondent, the Beauty Spring Water Company, a domestic corporation organized to supply water to the inhabitants of the town of West Turin, a part of which town forms the village of Lyons Falls, resists the payment of seventeen dollars and sixty-six cents of the tax levied against it by the village in 1908, upon the ground that it is for the maintenance of a municipal water system in the village in competition with the respondent water company, which is now supplying water in said village.

That the respondent is taxable in the village is not questioned ; neither is it claimed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Skaneateles Water Works Co. v. SkaneatelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Matter of City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Skaneateles Water Works Co. v. Village of SkaneatelesNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Village of Waverly v. Waverly Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Village of Waverly v. . Waverly Water CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beauty Spring Water Co. v. Village of Lyons FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API