Legal Opinion
Pacheco v. JOSEPH McMAHON CORPORATION
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 25, 2010No. Case 3:09CV488 (AWT)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Tina Pacheco (“Pacheco”), has moved for summary judgment on her claim pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”) against pro se defendant, Paul Miller, requesting $1,000 in statutory damages pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692k, plus attorneys’ fees and costs. For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is being granted.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Joseph McMahon Corporation, which has as its registered trade name “United Obligations”, is in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Western World Insurance Company v. Stack Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Christ Clomon v. Philip D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Pepsico, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zirogiannis v. Dreambuilder Investments LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- TicketNetwork, Inc. v. DarbouzeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- State Auto Insurance Companies v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
- Diesel MacHinery, Inc. v. Manitowoc Crane GroupDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2011
- Habibian v. Sudmann's Service & DiagnosticsNassau County District Court · 2017