Legal Opinion

Way v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 2, 1916No. 6837PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Trover; from city court of Dublin — Judge Hicks. July 7, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.

This ease was a trover suit against the plaintiff’s cropper, for the conversion of cotton and corn, grown upon the plaintiff’s land, and to the-possession of which he was entitled under sections 3705 and 3707 of' the Civil Code (1910). It is certified by the trial judge (ground 2 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial) that “the evidence discloses that Way, as cropper, at the time of disposing of said cotton, was only due the said Bailey for supplies or otherwise, a sum much less than value of property, while the court permitted the plaintiff to have judgment for the entire value of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Young v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Bell v. G. Ober & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Gordon & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  4. Cowart v. DeesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellis, McKinnon & Brown v. HoppsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Benton v. HarleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Franklin v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. George v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API