Legal Opinion

Binkley v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1990No. 55888-4PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

— Kenneth L. Binkley challenges the constitutionality of a municipality's employment decision. He alleges that the City of Tacoma (Tacoma) violated his right of free speech by reassigning him to another job after he lodged a complaint against his supervisor. He also alleges that the working conditions at his new job constituted constructive discharge. In an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the trial court found that Tacoma had retaliated against Binkley and awarded him damages, but also held that there was no constructive discharge. We reverse the section 1983 award and affirm the trial court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. White v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. White v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Smith v. Bates Technical CollegeWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Smith v. Bates Technical CollegeWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Martini v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API