Klazkin v. Richman-Klazkin

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

GROSS, J.

We grant the appellant/father’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our previous opinion, and issue the following opinion.

We affirm the order requiring appellant to pay forty percent of his daughter’s summer camp expenses and to reimburse the appellee/mother for these expenses from past years.

The language of paragraph eighteen of the marital settlement agreement was ambiguous. Thus, the trial court was able to consider extrinsic evidence to explain or clarify the ambiguous language. See Levitt v. Levitt, 699 So.2d 755, 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). The purpose of an…