Legal Opinion
Reeder v. Szmigel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 1, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, petition granted and determination annulled. Memorandum: Petitioners seek annulment of a use variance granted to intervenor Pinecrest Associates by respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Irondequoit. Special Term dismissed the petition. The variance permits construction of a branch bank upon a lot situate partly in an R-6 zone and partly in an R-5 zone.
It is first argued that petitioners do not have standing to bring this proceeding. We disagree. The proceeding is brought by petitioners both individually and as officers of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Douglaston Civic Ass'n v. GalvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Village Board v. JarroldNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- MATTER OF CROSSROADS RECREATION v. BrozNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Friends of Pine Bush v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Bellanca v. GatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Weiss v. Planning BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1985