Legal Opinion

Applied Research Laboratories v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 25, 1973No. C. R. D. 73-2; Court 70/35368, etcPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION RE: MOTION TO PERMIT CERTAIN CAUSES OF ACTION TO REMAIN IN THE OCTOBER 1970 RESERVE FILE BEYOND THE EXPIRATION DATE AS PROVIDED BY RULE 14.6

BOE, Chief Judge:

Pursuant to Rule 14.6(e) of the United States Customs Court, Stein and Shostak, attorneys for the plaintiffs, who in their moving papers refer to themselves as “attorneys for plaintiffs in numerous cases which may not have been voluntarily removed from the October, 1970 Reserve File of the United States Customs Court on or before October 31, 1972”, request this court to enter their order in the alternative as follows:

1. Stay the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Sweeney v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  4. The United States v. Chas. Kurz Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Quigley & Manard, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  2. Reynolds Trading Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API