Ausimont U.S.A. Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
The Environmental Protection Agency adopted a rule requiring petitioner manufacturers to conduct extensive testing of certain chemicals, fluoroalkenes, to determine their potential for producing adverse health effects. The manufacturers have petitioned for judicial review, asserting that the rule is contrary to law and should be set aside. An examination of the record persuades us that the agency action is supported by substantial evidence, and accordingly, we deny review.
The Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2601-29, authorizes EPA to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Charlton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Shell Chemical Co., Etc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- A Community Voice v. UsepaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- 2 for the Second CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Ausimont v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- East Fork Enterprises v. EPACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2026
- Labor Council v. EPACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021