Legal Opinion

Alder v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 24, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Ratliff

Affirming.

The appellant, Jake Alder, Pete Bilyeu and Earl Poindexter were jointly indicted by the Grand Jury of Christian county charging them with the offense of grand larceny, viz., that they stole the sum of $60 in money from the prosecuting witness, Phelps Thomas. Appellant was tried separately at the June 1938 term of court, convicted and sentenced .to the penitentiary for a period of one year, and from that judgment he has prosecuted this appeal, insisting upon a reversal of the judgment upon various grounds.(1) It is insisted that the court erred in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Howard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  2. Hogan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Burdette v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  4. Frain v. Applegate, JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Cosby v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. StarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. State v. McCaskeyWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Neal v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  5. McVey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API