Taylor v. Leesnitzer
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT • OF COLUMBIA. The facts are stated"in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
This is an appeal from a decree of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia dismissing an appeal from a decree of the Supreme Court. The bill was brought by the appellee Leesnitzer, as one of the heirs of Thomas Taylor, for a partition between herself and the other heirs of lands acquired by Taylor after the execution of his last will. By the will Taylor left all his estate, both real and personal, to his widow, the appellant. See Bradford v. Matthews, 9 App. D. C. 438. Crenshaw v. McCormick, 19 App. D. C. 438. Code D. C., § 1628. Hardenbergh v. Ray, 151 U. S. 112. The bill, of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brockett v. BrockettSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Hardenbergh v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Clark v. RollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Railroad Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
3Cited by6 opinions
- Edwards v. BodkinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
- Karrick v. EdesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
- Lasier v. LasierCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1917
- Browning v. BoswellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1913
- Canal Bank & Trust Co. v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.