Creager v. School District No. Nine
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa. (Arnold, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The. facts are stated in the opinion, and in head-note 1.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The plaintiff brought suit in justice’s court to recover the contract price for building a fence around defendant’s school site, and recovered a judgment of $30, and costs.
Upon appeal to the circuit court for Ottawa county, and trial before Hon. Dan. J. Arnold, circuit judge, without a jury,-the defendant had judgment.
■ The plaintiff brings error to this Court, and insists that the finding of facts does not support the judgment, arid asks that judgment be entered here for the plaintiff for the same amount rendered by the justice, that being the sum agreed upon in the contract hereinafter…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hemme v. School District No. 4Supreme Court of Kansas · 1883
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Burg v. Milwaukee Medical CollegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Ennor v. RaineNevada Supreme Court · 1903
- Commercial State Bank v. School District No. 3Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Fulk v. School Dist. No. 8 of Lancaster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- LaPorte v. Escanaba Area Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974