Legal Opinion
United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 25, 1941No. Eq. 85-73PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFEY, District Judge.
I approach the rendition of a decision with great diffidence. There are several reasons for this. Some of them I think should be explained.
For me there are four chief difficulties. The first is the size of the record. The second is a condition of the law applicable, —to which I shall refer. The third is the outcome, including especially the divergencies in the outcome, of sundry previous litigations. The fourth is certain features of the testimony, particularly conflicts, imposing the responsibility of passing on relative credibility of witnesses.
According to my…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- The Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation, the Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- United States v. United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1946
- Cole v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.