Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Burnopp
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 10, 1971No. [No. 54, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSingley, J.
This controversy arose when John Rogers and his partner, R. Wendell Brownley (who will be referred to collectively as Rogers) endeavored to prevent Howell Q. Burnopp and his wife, Lola E. Burnopp (the Burnopps) from using a right of way which they claimed to have over the Rogers tract.
Rogers has owned since 1967 a tract of some 78 acres, which is now being subdivided, on the north side of Dicus Mill Road in Anne Arundel County. Since 1947, the Burnopps have owned some 58 acres lying east of the Rogers property on Dicus Mill Road. These two properties share a common boundary at some distance…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smith v. ShiebeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Cox v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Moore v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Lurman v. HubnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
- Tamburo v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miceli v. FoleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Costello v. StaubitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Mayor of New Market v. ArmstrongCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Miklasz v. G.W. Stone, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Senez v. CollinsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.