Legal Opinion

State v. Rietveld

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 19, 1997No. 96-0980; CA A97043Published

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

The state moves for summary determination of the appealability of an order granting a criminal defendant’s motion for a new trial. We allow the motion, determine that the order is not appealable and dismiss the appeal.

Following a conviction for murder, defendant moved for, and obtained, an order granting a new trial. The state appealed the order. The state correctly acknowledges that its right to appeal in a criminal case is purely statutory and is governed generally by ORS 138.060. That statute lists the following orders as appealable:

“(1) An order made prior to trial dismissing or setting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. CarrilloOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Schrunk v. KeysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API