Legal Opinion

Poe v. Penn Mut. Life Ins.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided March 13, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRIMBLE, District Judge.

The facts in this case have been stipulated, and reference is made to the agreed statement of facts without repetition of the facts in this opinion. The issue arising from the facts, as agreed upon, is the question whether the plaintiff is entitled to recovery based upon the amount of $2,500, for which the policy of insurance was originally written, or whether the plaintiff is entitled to recovery based upon the amount of paid-up participating insurance in the sum of $429, which the defendant purchased with the proceeds of the value remaining in the policy after the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance Co. v. MooseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Life Cas. Ins. Co. of Tenn. v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  3. The Nat'l Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meier v. New Jersey Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. Stoner v. HumphriesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Meier v. New Jersey Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API