Legal Opinion

Alabama Produce Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 24, 1932No. 8 Div. 271PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The action of the court in overruling demurrer to the complaint, and in giving written charges and overruling motion for a new trial, is assigned as error.

Plaintiff contends that the facts are, that while he was walking along the eastern edge of the paved highway, known as the Bee Line highway in Morgan county, and going south on the left-hand side thereof, about two feet from the edge of the pavement, an automobile truck approached him from the rear, said truck going south and in the same direction appellee was walking, and being driven by one of the defendants or an agent of the Alabama…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. FosheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. R. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Jackson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Johnson v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Cooper v. Bishop Freeman Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Berry v. DannellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Couch v. HutchersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API