Legal Opinion

Union Properties, Inc. v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1943No. 29568PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Was the Court of Appeals correct in reversing the judgment of the trial court and denying the plaintiff recovery?

Section 3891-1, General Code, appearing in the chapted entitled “Assessments,” authorizes the council of a municipality by ordinance to establish fair rates or charges for the use of the municipal sewerage system which “shall constitute a lien upon the property served by such connection and if not paid when due shall be collected in the same manner as other city and village taxes.”

Pursuant to this statute, the city of Cleveland enacted ordinance No. 558-A-38, authorizing and fixing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simmons v. LooneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. TysonOhio Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Board of Trustees of the West Highway Sanitary & Improvement District v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Graines v. FleeterOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Galion v. HayesOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Phillips v. ElliottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API