Legal Opinion

Finkes v. Coe

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 29, 1943No. 8228Published

1Per curiam

In a suit under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, the District Court declined to authorize the issue of a patent for an improved hollow-back shovel. The significant concept in the appealed claim is the thickening, in order to resist wear and breakage, of the longitudinal central portion of the shovel blade. The width of this central portion, “substantially one-fifth that of the back edge of the blade,” and the rate at which it is tapered down, do not appear to be critical. Lowman patent No. 142,859, said to be the pioneer hollow-back shovel, uses a piece of sheet metal which “may be rolled of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohn v. United States Corset Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. In Re Von BramerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  3. In re DeckerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API