Sharon v. Hill
United States Circuit Court
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
Sawyer, J.,
(orally.) Títere is but one tiling to do in this case, and that is to overrule the plea. There are, in fact, two pleas: one is that another suit is pending in a state court for the same cause of suit; the oilier is that the complainant, Sharon, is a citizen of the state of California, oí which state the defendant is also a citizen, and therefore that this court lias no jurisdiction in the case. If the complainant had objected to the plea on account of duplicity and multifariousness, and set it down for argument instead 'of replying, the court would liavo been obliged to overrule it…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Gordon v. GilfoilSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fay v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Sharon v. HillUnited States Circuit Court · 1885
- Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Shoshone Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Gamble v. City of San DiegoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1897
- Barber v. National Carbon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.