Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 6, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paviola A. Soto, J.), entered on or about July 2, 2004, which, inter alia, granted the motion of defendants-respondents (the municipal defendants) to dismiss the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Municipalities are generally immune from tort liability when their employees perform discretionary acts involving the exercise of reasoned judgment, except in those cases where plaintiffs establish that they had a “special relationship” with the municipality giving rise to a duty enforceable in tort (see Pelaez v Seide, 2 NY3d 186…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tango v. TulevechNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Lauer v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Pelaez v. SeideNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Signature Health Center, LLC v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2010
  2. Ash v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API