Legal Opinion

Claim of Phillips v. Dunkirk Printing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1939Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the State Industrial Board. The facts are undisputed. Claimant was employed by some thirty property owners as night watchman. His duties varied somewhat among his employers but with the exception of the Dunkirk Printing Company, the employer here, his duties were those usual to a watchman. He had special duties to perform in connection with his employment by the Dunkirk Printing Company. Not only was he charged with the responsibility of watching the premises, but he was required to go into the printing company building in the early morning and start the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Moocheer v. A. H. Herrick & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Claim of Moochler v. A. H. Herrick & SonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API