Legal Opinion

Hoch v. Carter

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 30, 1965PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERLANDS, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendant (1) for an order substituting the United States of America as sole defendant herein, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d), and (2) for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The first part of defendant’s motion being unopposed, the relief sought therein is hereby granted; and the United States of America is hereby substituted for Francis Carter as sole defendant in this action.

The undisputed facts, as relevant to defendant’s motion for summary judgment are as follows:

Plaintiffs in this action are two infant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lewis Simon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Mark Pittman, a Minor, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem Milan L. Pittman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. United States v. Michael Glenn, a Minor, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Ida Mae GlennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. ElliotteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Zeidler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. Sammy J. Vantrease v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. Lien v. BeehnerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API