Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Blaine v. Erickson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Mandamus to compel the town clerk of Oakland, Douglas county, to use reassessment rolls as required by sec. 1087 — 57, Stats., in making his tax roll.

Read the full summary

Mandamus to compel the town clerk of Oakland, Douglas county, to use reassessment rolls as required by sec. 1087 — 57, Stats., in making his tax roll. The petition alleges that the defendant, Carl Erickson, is now and at the times stated herein was town clerk of the town of Oakland, formerly named South Range, in Douglas county; that the reassessment of certain property in said town for the year 1918 was made pursuant to statute and the order of the tax commission, and a reassessment roll of said town was made and completed and delivered to defendant as such town clerk on October 28, 1918,…

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed December 2, 1919:

Rosenberry, J.

The defendant objects to this court taking jurisdiction of this action, for the reason that the questions involved are purely local and that the remedy in the lower courts is adequate. In the Income Tax Cases, 148 Wis. 456, 134 N. W. 673, 135 N. W. 164, the court carefully reviews the provisions of the constitution, the statutory law, and the decisions of this court relating to the exercise *214of-its original jurisdiction by this court, and we shall not attempt a restatement of the matters there considered and stated. ' From the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Stahl v. O'MalleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Horton v. BrechlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Morse v. KrogerMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Board of Education of Nebo School Dist. v. JeppsonUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State ex rel. Joyce v. DeneenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API