MATTER OF BARNES v. La Vallee
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. Orders in both proceedings are affirmed, without costs. Despite able and earnest presentations by counsel (assigned by this court) in each proceeding, the fact remains that the initiating petitions are legally insufficient. Among other things, they fail to allege facts to establish the preconditions to the relief requested. Moreover, the gravamen in each petition is too general, vague, and insufficient to permit the court to consider other than abstract questions *723about an inadequately described or identified "religion” and its purported requirements, or the "literature” which…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Malik v. Officer BerlinlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Pettus v. Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Bogle v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Fogan-Chew v. Poughkeepsie Department of Public WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- MATTER OF BARNES v. La ValleeNew York Court of Appeals · 1976