McNeil v. Time Insurance
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
FISH, District Judge.
On June 24, 1997, a nonjury trial was held in this cause to decide the question whether the plaintiffs’ state law claims are preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”). Concluding that ERISA does preempt these claims, the court herein delivers its findings of fact and conclusions of law. Any finding of fact below may be deemed a conclusion of law,'and any conclusion may be deemed a finding of fact.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
On November 14, 1992, the plaintiff, Michael Jay McNeil (“McNeil”) 1 , who was a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Donovan v. DillinghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Memorial Hospital System v. Northbrook Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Martin Hansen, Cross-Appellee v. The Continental Insurance Company and Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Huisjack v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Acuna v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2008
- Barnes v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020