Legal Opinion
Varoz v. New Mexico Board of Podiatry
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided July 25, 1986No. 16010Published
1Opinion of the Court
722 P.2d 1176 (1986)
104 N.M. 454
Ted VAROZ, D.P.M., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
NEW MEXICO BOARD OF PODIATRY, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 16010.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
July 25, 1986.
Winston Roberts-Hohl, Santa Fe, for petitioner-appellant.
Paul Bardacke, Atty. Gen., Lyn Hebert, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for respondent-appellee.
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Dr. Varoz appeals from the order of the district court affirming the New Mexico Board of Podiatry's revocation of his professional license. Following indictment in January 1983, Dr. Varoz was convicted in federal district court on eight of twenty-five…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- In re MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners v. JorgensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Reid v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in OptometryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.