Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC v. Bacheller

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 27, 2012No. 10SC403Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Eid

¶ 50 The majority affirms the district court's trebling of punitive damages on the ground that there is evidence in the record to support the court's conclusion that the corporate defendants engaged in certain conduct during the pendency of the case. Maj. op. at T144-48. But under the straightforward language of the statute, trebling is only appropriate "if it is shown" that the defendant's conduct "further aggravated the damages of the plaintiff" § 183-21-102(8)(b), CRS. (2012). In other words, it is not enough for the conduct simply to have occurred, as the majority suggests, "it must be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Philip Morris USA v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Qwest Services Corp. v. BloodSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. Pinkstaff v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  4. In re the Marriage of WigginsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  5. Trattler v. CitronSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API